Safety and efficacy of single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: 3 years’ results

dc.contributor.authorYildiz G.
dc.contributor.authorCeylan Y.
dc.contributor.authorUcer O.
dc.contributor.authorArslan D.
dc.contributor.authorÇelik O.
dc.contributor.authorGunlusoy B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:11:40Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:11:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the success and complication rates of single-incision sling for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with a 3-year follow-up. Methods: This study comprised 173 female patients with SUI or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) with dominant SUI who underwent minisling procedure. All patients had positive cough stress test preoperatively; they were followed up for 3 years after surgery (1, 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly). Results: Total follow-up was 36 months, and mean age 51 years (44–77); 128 (74 %) patients presented SUI and 45 (26 %) MUI. Objective and subjective cure and failure rates were 83.8 % (145 cases), 6.4 % (11 cases), and 9.8 % (17 cases), respectively. There were no differences in cure rates between 1 and 3 years. Mean body mass index was 28.7 (26.1–35.2), and mean operating time 7.9 min. (6.5–11.9). There were no major intraoperative complications. Eleven patients (6.4 %) had de novo urge incontinence that resolved using anticholinergic drugs; no patient had urinary retention. Vaginal mesh extrusion was reported in nine (5.2 %) patients. Conclusions: The minisling system attained high success rates at 3 years’ follow-up. The procedure was easy to learn and has lower complication rate. © 2016, The International Urogynecological Association.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1007/s00192-016-3001-0
dc.identifier.issn09373462
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/15748
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer London
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectGynecologic Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOperative Time
dc.subjectPostoperative Period
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectSuburethral Slings
dc.subjectSurgical Mesh
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectUltrasonography
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence, Stress
dc.subjectantiinflammatory agent
dc.subjectcholinergic receptor blocking agent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical outcome
dc.subjectcoughing
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectincision
dc.subjectinguinal pain
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmedical device complication
dc.subjectmixed incontinence
dc.subjectmulticenter study
dc.subjectpostoperative analgesia
dc.subjectpostoperative care
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectpostoperative infection
dc.subjectpostoperative pain
dc.subjectpreoperative period
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectrecurrent infection
dc.subjectstress incontinence
dc.subjectsuburethral sling
dc.subjectsuburethral sling procedure
dc.subjecturge incontinence
dc.subjecturinary tract infection
dc.subjecturinary tract surgery
dc.subjectvaginal mesh extrusion
dc.subjectadverse effects
dc.subjectbladder
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjectevaluation study
dc.subjectgynecologic surgery
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjectoperation duration
dc.subjectpostoperative period
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectsuburethral sling
dc.subjectsurgical mesh
dc.subjecttime factor
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence, Stress
dc.titleSafety and efficacy of single-incision sling for female stress urinary incontinence: 3 years’ results
dc.typeArticle

Files