The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the constipation risk assessment scale

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKutlu A.K.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz E.
dc.contributor.authorÇeçen D.
dc.contributor.authorEser E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:20:09Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:20:09Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to translate into the Turkish language, and test the reliability and validity, of the Turkish version of the Constipation Risk Assessment Scale (CRAS). This study consisted of 245 adult in-patients who were hospitalized in the medical and surgical clinics of Celal Bayar University Hospital in January through May 2007. The patients were categorized into two groups (constipated and not constipated) according to Rome II criteria. All participants were assessed with the CRAS. The CRAS was retested on 32 patients selected randomly from among the initial constipated group (n =152). The statistical analysis consisted of reliability and validity analyses. Test-retest comparison and internal consistency were used to assess the reliability of the instrument. Divergence and known groups approaches were used to test for construct validity. Correlation analysis using the Pearson's coefficient was conducted to assess the test-retest. For testing of the criteria and known groups, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. Cronbach's = value for the constipated respondents was r = 61.9. According to the effect size comparisons, the most effective variable on the CRAS score was perception of constipation risk requirement. The overall score and subsection score correlations were also found acceptable (r = 0.47-0.57). © The Society of Gastroenterology Nurses & Associates 2011. All Rights Reserved.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1097/SGA.0b013e31821ab553
dc.identifier.issn15389766
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/18017
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAntidepressive Agents
dc.subjectChronic Disease
dc.subjectConstipation
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectDrug Therapy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInpatients
dc.subjectIron
dc.subjectLife Style
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPregnancy Complications
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSex Distribution
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectantidepressant agent
dc.subjectiron
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectchronic disease
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectconstipation
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectdrug therapy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthospital patient
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlifestyle
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectpregnancy complication
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectsex ratio
dc.subjectstatistics
dc.subjectTurkey (republic)
dc.titleThe reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the constipation risk assessment scale
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu