Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPasserotti C.C.
dc.contributor.authorFranco F.
dc.contributor.authorBissoli J.C.C.
dc.contributor.authorTiseo B.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira C.M.
dc.contributor.authorBuchalla C.A.O.
dc.contributor.authorInoue G.N.C.
dc.contributor.authorSencan A.
dc.contributor.authorSencan A.
dc.contributor.authordo Pardo R.R.
dc.contributor.authorNguyen H.T.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T08:13:01Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T08:13:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Robotic assistance may provide for distinct technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic technique. The goals of this study were (1) to objectively evaluate the difference in the learning curves by novice and expert surgeons in performing fundamental laparoscopic skills using conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and (2) to evaluate the surgeons’ frustration level in performing these tasks. Methods: Twelve experienced and 31 novices in laparoscopy were prospectively evaluated in performing three standardized laparoscopic tasks in five consecutive, weekly training sessions. Analysis of the learning curves was based on the magnitude, rate, and quickness in performance improvement. The participant’s frustration and mood were also evaluated during and after every session. Results: For the novice participants, RALS allowed for shorter time to task completion and greater accuracy. However, significant and rapid improvement in performance as measured by magnitude, rate, and quickness at each session was also seen with CLS. For the experienced surgeons, RALS only provided a slight improvement in performance. For all participants, the use of RALS was associated with less number of sessions in which they felt frustrated, less number of frustration episodes during a session, lower frustration score during and after the session, and higher good mood score. Conclusion: The advantages of RALS may be of most benefit when doing more complex tasks and by less experienced surgeons. RALS should not be used as a replacement for CLS but rather in specific situations in which it has the greatest advantages. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1007/s11255-015-0991-3
dc.identifier.issn03011623
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/16263
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.subjectClinical Competence
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Graduate
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInservice Training
dc.subjectLaparoscopy
dc.subjectLearning Curve
dc.subjectNeeds Assessment
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectRobotic Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectStress, Psychological
dc.subjectStudents, Medical
dc.subjectTask Performance and Analysis
dc.subjectaccuracy
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcompletion time
dc.subjectfrustration
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaparoscopy
dc.subjectlearning curve
dc.subjectmedical student
dc.subjectmood
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectrobot assisted surgery
dc.subjectskill
dc.subjectsurgeon
dc.subjectsurgical skill
dc.subjectsurgical training
dc.subjecttask performance
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjectclinical competence
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjecteducation
dc.subjectetiology
dc.subjectin service training
dc.subjectlearning curve
dc.subjectmedical education
dc.subjectmental stress
dc.subjectneeds assessment
dc.subjectphysician
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectrobotic surgical procedure
dc.subjecttask performance
dc.titleComparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Scopus Koleksiyonu