Skip to main content
English
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Español
Français
Gàidhlig
Italiano
Latviešu
Magyar
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Srpski (lat)
Suomi
Svenska
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
Қазақ
বাংলা
हिंदी
Ελληνικά
Српски
Yкраї́нська
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
All Contents
Statistics
English
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Español
Français
Gàidhlig
Italiano
Latviešu
Magyar
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Srpski (lat)
Suomi
Svenska
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
Қазақ
বাংলা
हिंदी
Ελληνικά
Српски
Yкраї́нська
Log In
Email address
Password
Log in
Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Araştırma Çıktıları | Web Of Science
Web of Science Koleksiyonu
English
English
No Thumbnail Available
Date
Authors
Ashames, MMA
Demir, A
Gerek, ON
Fidan, M
Gulmezoglu, MB
Ergin, S
Edizkan, R
Koc, M
Barkana, A
Calisir, C
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
2662-4729
Abstract
SPRINGER
Description
Keywords
Following the great success of various deep learning methods in image and object classification, the biomedical image processing society is also overwhelmed with their applications to various automatic diagnosis cases. Unfortunately, most of the deep learning-based classification attempts in the literature solely focus on the aim of extreme accuracy scores, without considering interpretability, or patient-wise separation of training and test data. For example, most lung nodule classification papers using deep learning randomly shuffle data and split it into training, validation, and test sets, causing certain images from the Computed Tomography (CT) scan of a person to be in the training set, while other images of the same person to be in the validation or testing image sets. This can result in reporting misleading accuracy rates and the learning of irrelevant features, ultimately reducing the real-life usability of these models. When the deep neural networks trained on the traditional, unfair data shuffling method are challenged with new patient images, it is observed that the trained models perform poorly. In contrast, deep neural networks trained with strict patient-level separation maintain their accuracy rates even when new patient images are tested. Heat map visualizations of the activations of the deep neural networks trained with strict patient-level separation indicate a higher degree of focus on the relevant nodules. We argue that the research question posed in the title has a positive answer only if the deep neural networks are trained with images of patients that are strictly isolated from the validation and testing patient sets.
Citation
URI
http://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/7105
Collections
Web of Science Koleksiyonu
Full item page