The relationship between uterine prolapse and premalignant endometrial pathology

dc.contributor.authorGene M.
dc.contributor.authorCelik E.
dc.contributor.authorEskicioglu F.
dc.contributor.authorGur E.B.
dc.contributor.authorKurtulmus S.
dc.contributor.authorGulec E.
dc.contributor.authorGuclu S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T11:09:36Z
dc.date.available2025-04-10T11:09:36Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to stress the importance of performing a thorough uterine assessment before selecting an organ- sparing surgery in patients presenting with uterine prolapse and no other complaints. Materials and Methods: This study included a total of 111 participants who presented with pelvic organ prolapse and underwent hysterectomy for grades 3-4 uterine prolapse. The post- hysterectomy histopathology results were classified as benign (atrophic endometrium, proliferative or secretory endometrium) or pathologic (endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial polyp, adenomyosis, myoma uteri, and endometrium carcinoma). Results: Of the 111 patients enrolled in this study, 23 (20.2%) had endometrial hyperplasia, eight (7.2%) had endometrial polyps, 30 (27%) had uterine fibroids, and 20 (18%) had adenomyosis. Conclusion: There may be premalignant lesions of the endometrium in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women presenting with uterine prolapse and no other symptoms. A chronic inflammatory process resulting from the extra-vaginal location of the uterus may play a role in the development of these lesions. Further studies are needed on this subject.
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.12891/ceoj.2095.2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14701/48866
dc.publisherS.O.G. CANADA Inc.
dc.titleThe relationship between uterine prolapse and premalignant endometrial pathology
dc.typeArticle

Files