Regorafenib Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma Beyond Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Large, Multicenter, Real-Life Study
dc.contributor.author | Tünbekici S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuksel H.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Acar C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sahin G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Orman S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Majidova N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Coskun A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Seyyar M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dilek M.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kara M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dıslı A.K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Demir T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kolkıran N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sahbazlar M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Demırcıler E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuş F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aytac A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Menekse S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yucel H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Biter S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Koseci T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Unsal A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozveren A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sevınc A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Goker E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gürsoy P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-10T11:01:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-10T11:01:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background/Objectives: In the REGOMA trial, regorafenib demonstrated an overall survival advantage over lomustine, and it has become a recommended treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in guidelines. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of regorafenib as a third-line treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma who progressed while taking bevacizumab-based therapy. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study in Turkey included 65 patients treated between 2021 and 2023 across 19 oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, progression after second-line bevacizumab-based treatment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (18–67 years), with a median progression-free survival of 2.5 months (95% Confidence Interval: 2.23–2.75) and a median overall survival of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.52–4.68). The median overall survival was improved in patients who received subsequent therapy after regorafenib treatment compared with those who did not (p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was longer in patients with ECOG 0–1 than in those with ECOG 2 (p = 0.042). The safety profile was consistent with that of the REGOMA trial, with no drug-related deaths observed. Conclusions: Regorafenib shows good efficacy and safety as a third-line treatment for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab-based therapy. This study supports the use of regorafenib and emphasizes the need for further randomized studies to validate its role and optimize treatment strategies. © 2024 by the authors. | |
dc.identifier.DOI-ID | 10.3390/cancers17010046 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14701/43645 | |
dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | |
dc.title | Regorafenib Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma Beyond Bevacizumab-Based Therapy: A Large, Multicenter, Real-Life Study | |
dc.type | Article |