Different patterns of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depression: A pilot modification of the hypomania checklist-32 to assess mixed depression
dc.contributor.author | Prieto M.L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Youngstrom E.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozerdem A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Altinbas K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Quiroz D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydemir O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalin N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Geske J.R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Feeder S.E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Angst J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Frye M.A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-10T11:10:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-10T11:10:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description.abstract | Methods The study sample consisted of 188 patients with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR disorders (SCID) confirmed bipolar or major depressive disorder. We modified the Hypomania Checklist-32 (mHCL-32) to assess current instead of lifetime symptoms. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify clusters of mHCL-32 items that were endorsed concurrently. A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was carried out to identify groups of patients with similar mHCL-32 item endorsement patterns.; Background There are no self-report scales that assess manic/hypomanic symptoms in patients with depression. The aim of this study was to explore the use of a modified screening instrument for bipolar disorder to assess current manic/hypomanic symptoms in patients with a depressive episode.; Results The EFA identified 3 factors: factor #1 ("elation-disinhibition-increased goal directed activity"), factor #2 ("risk-taking-impulsivity-substance use") and factor #3 (distractibility-irritability). The LCA yielded 3 classes (2 showing manic/hypomanic features). While class #1 patients endorsed more items related to disinhibition and racing thoughts, class #2 patients recognized more items associated with irritability and substance use.; Limitations Lack of an adequate gold standard measure of mixed depression to compare to, the cross-sectional design and the lack of a validation sample.; Conclusions The mHCL-32 scale allowed a comprehensive and convergent delineation of hypomanic/manic symptoms in depression. Further validation of these findings is needed. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
dc.identifier.DOI-ID | 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.047 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14701/49259 | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | |
dc.title | Different patterns of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depression: A pilot modification of the hypomania checklist-32 to assess mixed depression | |
dc.type | Article |