Different patterns of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depression: A pilot modification of the hypomania checklist-32 to assess mixed depression
dc.contributor.author | Prieto, ML | |
dc.contributor.author | Youngstrom, EA | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozerdem, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Altinbas, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Quiroz, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydemir, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalin, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Geske, JR | |
dc.contributor.author | Feeder, SE | |
dc.contributor.author | Angst, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Frye, MA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-18T12:07:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-18T12:07:39Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: There are no self-report scales that assess manic/hypomanic symptoms in patients with depression. The aim of this study was to explore the use of a modified screening instrument for bipolar disorder to assess current manic/hypomanic symptoms in patients with a depressive episode. Methods: The study sample consisted of 188 patients with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR disorders (SCID) confirmed bipolar or major depressive disorder. We modified the Hypomania Checklist-32 (mHCL-32) to assess current instead of lifetime symptoms. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify clusters of mHCL-32 items that were endorsed concurrently. A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was carried out to identify groups of patients with similar mHCL-32 item endorsement patterns. Results: The EPA identified 3 factors: factor #1 (elation-disinhibition-increased goal directed activity), factor #2 (risk-taking-impulsivity-substance use) and factor #3 (distractibility-irritability). The LCA yielded 3 classes (2 showing manic/hypomanic features). While class #1 patients endorsed more items related to disinhibition and racing thoughts, class #2 patients recognized more items associated with irritability and substance use Limitations: Lack of an adequate gold standard measure of mixed depression to compare to, the cross-sectional design and the lack of a validation sample. Conclusions: The mHCL-32 scale allowed a comprehensive and convergent delineation of hypomanic/manic symptoms in depression. Further validation of these findings is needed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved, | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | |
dc.identifier.other | 1573-2517 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/10562 | |
dc.language.iso | English | |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | |
dc.subject | TASK-FORCE REPORT | |
dc.subject | BIPOLAR DISORDERS | |
dc.subject | RATING-SCALE | |
dc.subject | INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY | |
dc.subject | SUBSTANCE-ABUSE | |
dc.subject | VALIDATION | |
dc.subject | STATES | |
dc.subject | MANIA | |
dc.subject | PHENOMENOLOGY | |
dc.subject | PREVALENCE | |
dc.title | Different patterns of manic/hypomanic symptoms in depression: A pilot modification of the hypomania checklist-32 to assess mixed depression | |
dc.type | Article |