Testicular sperm retrieval method

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGümüs, BH
dc.contributor.authorAtesci, YZ
dc.contributor.authorUcer, O
dc.contributor.authorKaratas, TC
dc.contributor.authorBuyuksu, C
dc.contributor.authorNese, N
dc.contributor.authorKandiloglu, AR
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T11:39:16Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T11:39:16Z
dc.description.abstractThis research was conducted to evaluate the effects of a transverse vs. longitudinal incision for testicular sperm retrieval. Rats were divided into 4 groups: I: control, II: sham operation, III: longitudinal incision TSRM, IV: transverse incision TSRM. Group II (sham operation) had a dissection of left testis/spermatic cord, then closure of wound. Group III underwent dissection of left testis, then a longitudinal incision (15 mm long) of testis, which was fully opened then closed again and sutured with 5-0 Vicryl (R) sutures. Group IV underwent dissection of the left testis, opening of the testis with a transverse incision, then closure with 5-0 Vicryl (R). The seminiferous tubule diameter was 0.118-0.224 mm in all groups. inflammation and abscess formation occurred in one testis each in the sham and longitudinal incision groups, and in two testes in the transverse incision group. There were no differences in histopathology or scoring between the longitudinal and the transverse incision.
dc.identifier.issn0148-5016
dc.identifier.urihttp://akademikarsiv.cbu.edu.tr:4000/handle/123456789/1526
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.subjectEXTRACTION
dc.subjectMEN
dc.titleTesticular sperm retrieval method
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Web of Science Koleksiyonu